Supreme Court’s views on Maratha quota

Supreme Court’s views on the Maratha quota

Supreme Court’s views on the Maratha quota

The separate reservation given to Maharashtra’s Maratha community, the Supreme Court has underscored the importance of adhering to the 50% limit on total reservation, as well as the need to justify any excess by showing the existence of exceptional circumstances.
The Court has not only found no merit in the Maratha claim to backwardness but also said the community is adequately represented in public services.

Maratha reservation

It is no surprise that the Maratha quota, given by Maharashtra through a 2018 law, did not survive judicial scrutiny by a Constitution Bench.
The 16% quota in admissions to educational institutions and jobs in public services — later brought down to 12% in admissions and 13% in jobs through a 2019 amendment — took the total reservation in the State beyond the 50% ceiling imposed by earlier verdicts.
The five-Judge Bench has held that the State has not shown any exceptional circumstance to justify exceeding the limit.
The Bombay High Court had upheld the validity of the Maratha reservation in principle, but ruled that the law could not have fixed the percentage above what was recommended by the State Backward Classes Commission headed by M.G. Gaikwad.
The Supreme Court has now set aside this ruling, rejecting the HC’s reasoning that the denial of backward class status to the Marathas had pushed them deeper into social and educational backwardness, and that this constituted a special circumstance in support of their claim to separate reservation.
The Court’s categorical refusal to reconsider the 50% limit set down by a verdict in Indra Sawhney (1992) may threaten the continuance of different kinds of reservation in States.
The Court’s interpretation of the 102nd Constitution Amendment, by which a National Commission for Backward Classes was created, has proved right fears that the national body’s role and power may impact the rights of States.

Single list of SEBC

The Court has ruled that, henceforth, there will only be a single list of socially and educationally backward classes with respect to each State and Union Territory notified by the President of India, and that States can only make recommendations for inclusion or exclusion, with any subsequent change to be made only by Parliament.

Issue

Several MPs had argued that the Amendment would denude the States of their power, but the Centre had assured them that it was not so.

Conclusion

The Court has now ruled that Parliament’s intent was to create a scheme to identify SEBCs in the same manner as SCs and STs.
The President alone, to the exclusion of all other authorities, is now empowered to identify SEBCs under Article 342A.

Article 342A

The President may with respect to any State or Union territory, and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof, by public notification, specify the socially and educationally backward classes which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be socially and educationally backward classes.

Source: TH

Join Our Telegram

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)

India-Qatar

08 Nov, 25
SHARE

The India-Qatar Joint Commission on Economic and Commercial Cooperation (JCEC) meeting marked a significant step in strengthening bilateral ties between India and Qatar, focusing on boosting trade, investment, and collaboration across several sectors. Key Outcomes of the India-Qatar Joint Commission Meeting: Ambitious Trade Target:

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)

08 Nov, 25
SHARE

India and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) recently celebrated 80 years of partnership on World Food Day 2025. About the FAO The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations established in October 1945. It is the oldest permanent specialized agency of the UN and pl

First Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk1A

08 Nov, 25
SHARE

India's Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk1A is set to join the fleet of the Indian Air Force (IAF), marking a significant milestone in India's indigenous fighter jet program. Developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), the Tejas Mk1A is an upgraded version of the Tejas Mk1, designed to improve its operational capabilities, surv

Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA)

05 Nov, 25
SHARE

The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, officially known as the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, was enacted with the aim of recognizing and vesting forest rights to communities historically dependent on forests. These communities, especially Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwel

India’s External Debt 2025

05 Nov, 25
SHARE

India’s external debt has risen to USD 747.2 billion by the end of June 2025, marking a 1.5% increase from the previous quarter, according to the latest data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Despite this increase, India’s external debt remains manageable due to various stabilizing factors. Current Status of India’s Ex