Ordinance route of the government- issue promulgation

Introduction

• The central government has promulgated the ordinance that establishes the Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas Ordinance, 2020.

About ordinance

• The Constitution permits the central and State governments to make laws when Parliament (or the State Legislature) is not in session (U/A.123 and 213).
• As law making is a legislative function, this power is provided for urgent requirements, and the law thus made has an automatic expiry date.
• The Constitution states that the ordinance will lapse at the end of six weeks from the time Parliament (or the State Legislature) next meets, so maximum time limit is 6 months and 6 weeks.

Issue of the ordinance in Constituent Assembly

• In the Constituent Assembly, while there was a discussion on how long the ordinance could remain valid (with some members asking for it to lapse within four weeks of promulgation as that would be sufficient time to call an urgent session of Parliament), no one raised the possibility of an ordinance to be re-promulgated.

What the data show

• Whereas an ordinance was originally conceived as an emergency provision, it was used fairly regularly.
• In the 1950s, central ordinances were issued at an average of 7.1 per year.
• The number peaked in the 1990s at 19.6 per year, and declined to 7.9 per year in the 2010s.
• The last couple of years has seen a spike, 16 in 2019, 15 in 2020, and four till now this year.
• State governments also used this provision very often.
• The issue was brought up in the Supreme Court through a writ petition by D.C. Wadhwa, a professor of economics, who discovered this fact when he was researching land tenures.
  • He found out that Bihar had issued 256 ordinances between 1967 and 1981, of which 69 were repromulgated several times, including 11 which were kept alive for more than 10 years

• The Centre also started to follow the lead of Bihar.
  • For example, in 2013 and 2014, the Securities Laws (Amendment) ordinance was promulgated three times.
  • Similarly, an ordinance to amend the Land Acquisition Act was issued in December 2014, and repromulgated twice

An unconstitutional practice

• The matter came up again in the Supreme Court, and in January 2017, a seven-judge Constitution Bench declared this practice to be unconstitutional.
• The judgment concluded that “Re-promulgation of ordinances is a fraud on the Constitution and a subversion of democratic legislative processes“
• Even this judgment has been ignored.
  • The Indian Medical Council Amendment Ordinance was issued in September 2018, and reissued in January 2019, as it was passed by only one House of Parliament in the intervening session.
  • The current case of the Commission for Air Quality Management is even more egregious, the ordinance has been repromulgated now.
• States have also been using the ordinance route to enact laws.
  • For example, in 2020, Kerala issued 81 ordinances, while Karnataka issued 24 and Maharashtra 21.
  • Kerala has also repromulgated ordinances: one ordinance to set up a Kerala University of Digital Sciences, Innovation and Technology has been promulgated five times between January 2020 and February 2021.

Way forward

• Ordinances are to tackle exigencies when the legislature is not in session, and expire at the end of six weeks of the next meeting of the legislature.
• Repromulgation is not permitted as that would be a usurpation of legislative power by the executive.
• As governments, both at the Centre and States, are violating this principle, the legislatures and the courts should check the practice.
• That is what separation of powers and the concept of checks and balances means.