Debate on 70 Hour Work Week

Recently Infosys founder N.R. Narayana Murthy sparked a debate, urging young Indians to work 70 hours per week.

What are the arguments in favour of 70 hour work week?

• Economic productivity- A long work week boost economic productivity, leads to employment opportunities and overall economic growth.
• Worker efficiency- It will increase the productivity and efficiency of the Indian workforce, which is currently one of the lowest in the world.
• This would meet market demands, generate profit in a competitive global market.
• Developed country- It is necessary for India to become a developed country and uplift the living standards of its people.
• Skill acquisition- It will enable young Indians to learn new skills, acquire more knowledge, and innovate more solutions for the country’s problems.
• Success stories- It will help India emulate the success stories of Japan and Germany, which worked hard and long hours to rebuild their nations after the Second World War.

What are the arguments against the 70 hour work week?

• One size does not fit all- 89% of the Indian workforce is engaged in informal employment, compared to just 4.2% in Germany and 8% in Japan.
• Hence comparing these countries with India in labour productivity in not viable.
• Exploitation- A prolonged work week can lead to the exploitation of the working class and deprives their rights and benefits.
• Health impacts - It can negatively impact mental and physical health, resulting in stress, burnout, fatigue, sleep deprivation and other health problems.
• Work-life balance- As per ILO, companies that implement work-life balance policies benefit from increased retention of current employees, improved recruitment, lower rates of absenteeism and higher productivity.
• Counterproductive- It can reduce quality and efficiency of the work output, increase the chances of errors and accidents, lowers the morale and motivation of the workers.
• Economic inequality- Rich benefit from long work hours of working class which may widen the inequality between working class and rich.
• Productivity- Productivity is an attribute of skill, not time, and that reducing working hours can improve leisure and quality of life without reducing output value.
• Working more than eight hours a day also leads to lower hourly output.
  • Belgium has given the workers the right to work four days a week without a salary reduction to create a more dynamic and productive economy.
• Outdated- 70 hour work week is outdated as it does not suit the changing needs and preferences of the modern workforce, which values flexibility, autonomy and work-life balance.
• Lacks funding- Worker productivity depends on the amount of capital and the quality of institutions that support investment and innovation, hence just increasing working hours will have no impact on productivity.
• Labour productivity- India’s average annual working hours stayed above 2,000 from 1970 to 2020, while the labour productivity increased marginally from 2 dollars per hour to 9 dollars in the same period.
• Hence the need of the hour is to increase productivity through technology rather increasing working hours.