Playing catch up in flood forecasting technology

Context:

• The article analyzes the current flood forecasting system in India and its lacunae and suggests appropriate measures to improve it.

Floods in India:

• Floods have been a recurrent phenomenon in India and cause huge losses to lives, properties, livelihood systems, infrastructure and public utilities.
• According to the National Disaster Management Authority, around 40 million hectares of land in India are exposed to floods (around 12 percent of the total land area).
• The most flood-prone basins are those of the Ganga and Brahmaputra in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal and Assam, followed by Baitarni, the Brahmani, and the Subarnarekha basin in Odisha.
• Kerala has witnessed large scale flooding for consecutive years.
• Urban areas like Mumbai and Chennai have witnessed urban flooding over the years.
• There has been a rapid increase in flood proneness over time with floods having occurred in areas that were earlier not considered flood-prone.

Flood forecasting system in India:

• The India Meteorological Department issues meteorological or weather forecasts of rainfall.
• The Central Water Commission integrates the rainfall forecast (also known as Quantitative Precipitation Forecast or QPF) into its system to issue flood forecasts at various river points.
• The CWC then disseminates this data to end-user agencies (district administration, municipalities and disaster management authorities), who take necessary precautionary measures.

Shortcomings:

1. Deterministic forecasting model:

• India currently employs the “Deterministic forecasting” model, i.e., it only provides a “Rising” or “Falling” type forecast.
• The flood forecast merely uses the words “Rising” or “Falling” above a water level at a river point and does not provide any idea of the area of inundation or its depth.
• The “lead time” or the time available to act in case of such a model is just 24 hours. So the end-users receiving such forecasts have very little time to act.
• The length of time from issuance of the forecast and occurrence of a flood event termed as “lead time” is the most crucial aspect of any flood forecast to enable risk-based decision-making and undertaking of cost-effective rescue missions by end-user agencies.
• The accuracy of the forecast also decreases at 24 hours and beyond.

2. Multiple agencies:

• As discussed earlier, the flood forecasting system in India depends on the coordination of multiple agencies.
• Given that flood forecasting needs the CWC and IMD to complement each other’s works, it has been observed that the technological gap limits of one agency can limit the effectiveness of the other.
• The lack of technological parity between multiple agencies can have a detrimental impact on the overall effectiveness of the flood forecasting system in India.

3. Outdated methodology:

• Most flood forecasts at several river points across India are based on outdated statistical methods that cannot enable a lead time of fewer than 24 hours.
• These statistical methods also fail to capture the hydrological response of river basins between a base station and a forecast station.

4. Lack of adequate resources:

• The lack of an adequately dense S-band radar network in India is a cause of concern. This can enlarge the forecast error in QPF which would ultimately reflect in the CWC’s flood forecast.
• These S-band Doppler weather radars with a range of 250-300 km and higher accuracy can help provide more accurate QPF.

Impact due to the present flood forecasting system:

• Outdated technologies and a lack of technological parity between multiple agencies not only decrease the crucial lead time but also increase forecasting errors.
• This burden of interpretation ultimately shifts to hapless end-user agencies. The outcome is an increase in flood risk and disaster.

Solution:

India should work towards probabilistic-based flood forecasts with a lead time of more than seven to 10 days and also work towards better integration between multiple flood forecasting agencies.