×

08 October, 2019

9 Min Read

Download PDF Of The Day
Paper Topics Subject
GS-I The great disruption of 2016
GS-II Delhi needs to do more to protect and deepen ties with Dhaka. International Relations
GS-III The fight over Mumbai’s Aarey Colony
GS-I :
The great disruption of 2016

GS-III: The great disruption of 2016

Context

India’s overnight ban on high-value currency notes in 2016 was a shock.

Studies

  • According to a study published recently by the US National Bureau of Economic Research, demonetization reduced jobs by up to 3%.
  • It also hurt economic activity by a similar magnitude in the first two months after it took effect.
  • Research has also found that the exercise aimed at spiking black money, curbing corruption and depriving terrorists of funds led to a 2% decline in bank lending in that period.
  • The research paper examines the impact of demonetization across the country at the district level to make national-effect estimates.

Research

  • The research method employed reveals that the note ban’s shock was felt unevenly across the country.
  • Some regions were hit harder than others because they had a higher proportion of high-value notes in circulation.
  • The study’s period of analysis has not captured the secondary effects of the ban which are still being felt.
  • Late 2016 disrupted a recovery of India’s economy and sent it into a prolonged slump from which it is yet to emerge.

 

 

Print PDF

GS-II : International Relations
Delhi needs to do more to protect and deepen ties with Dhaka.

GS-II: Delhi needs to do more to protect and deepen ties with Dhaka.

Context

Sheikh Hasina made a four-day official visit to India.

Joint statement

  • The joint statement contained mutual appreciation for steps taken in various fields and outlines of what is intended in the use of ports and connectivity, water sharing, power, gas, education, culture, defence.
  • For Bangladesh, the reference to the plight of the “forcibly displaced” persons of Rakhine in Myanmar is a positive development.
  • The joint statement lacked the vision of the one issued after Hasina’s visit in 2010. The effort then was to raise the relationship after a dark period of suspicion and hostility.

From the meet

  • Bangladesh PM articulated points critical for the future welfare of South Asia.
  • To move beyond the majority-minority mindset… Pluralism has been the strength. To celebrate South Asia’s diversities in religion, ethnicity and language.
  • To manage geopolitical realities through friendship and collaboration. To balance regional political realities for the interest of people.

Bangladesh – internal picture:

  • After two terms in power, there would be a degree of public apathy towards the Awami League government.
  • There’s also a steady increase in the GDP, improvement in all parameters of economic activity as also law and order.
  • The committed pushback against jihadi activities supported from foreign shores.

Trouble in India-Bangladesh relations

  • The National Register of Citizens has been a worry for Bangladesh. Given the impoverished and uneducated status of those affected, it is questionable how the levels of appeal can be accessed.
  • The NRC, to be extended to all of India may eventually fall-out on Bangladesh and Indo-Bangladesh relations.

What Bangladesh delivered

  • The Ganga Waters Agreement had removed an intractable problem permanently vitiating the relationship. 
  • The Land and Maritime Boundary Agreements were of mutual benefit.
  • Bangladesh has comprehensively addressed Indian concerns with regard to support to militant elements in the North-east. 

India 

  • It continues to be unable to deliver on Teesta. 
  • The Ganga Barrage project in Bangladesh carries economic advantages as well as political overtones but has not been addressed with suitable despatch by India to enable Bangladesh to obtain external funding. 
  • Delay in implementation of the BBIN is inexplicable.

Way ahead

  • India should not be perceived as committed to the Awami League.
  • India’s perceived quasi-support to the BNP prior to the 2001 elections and its consequences should not be forgotten.
  • India’s internal aberrations should not derail the one substantive relationship we have developed in the neighbourhood.

 

Print PDF

GS-III :
The fight over Mumbai’s Aarey Colony

GS-III: The fight over Mumbai’s Aarey Colony.

News

Aarey Colony

The Aarey Milk Colony was envisioned by Dara N Khurody, the less famous colleague of Verghese Kurien. The two shared Ramon Magsaysay Award for their work in 1963.The Colony was established in 1949 and was inaugurated by then Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in 1951.

Why under siege?

  • The felling of trees is aimed at creating space for the construction of a Mumbai Metro train shed, is being opposed by environmentalists as well as local residents.
  • This has sparked campaigns and protests all across the country.
  • The Aarey forest is very close to the Sanjay Gandhi National Park. The activists argue that the Aarey forest is part of the same vegetation cover.

 

Where do things stand in the Aarey Milk Colony tree-felling case matter?

  • This means that while the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) cannot cut any more trees at the site of the proposed car shed, it can go ahead with construction activity related to the project.
  • The court directed that everyone arrested for protesting the felling of the trees should be released.

What is the core issue?

  • The site is on the bank of the Mithi River, with several channels and tributaries flowing into it  and construction for the “polluting industry” could flood Mumbai.
  • The court accepted the letter of litigant as PIL and set up the special Bench.
  • The petitioners had questioned the propriety and legality of the BMC Tree Authority’s permission for the tree-felling, and asked for Aarey to be declared a flood plain and a forest.
  • Activists argue that Aarey is an extension of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, and that the car shed would pave the way for greater commercial exploitation of the area.

Why does Metro want the car shed here?

MMRCL argues that this land belongs to the state  it is with the Dairy Development Department — and therefore, the long, messy, and expensive process of acquisition can be avoided, with zero additional cost to citizens.

Aarey is located 800 metres from SEEPZ, the last station on the 33.5-km Colaba-SEEPZ line the optimum distance from where operations can be serviced swiftly.

How will this affect Aarey environment?

  • The proposed car shed will house washing, maintenance, and repair works facilities.
  • A railway car shed is a “Red Category” industry, which causes the highest level of pollution.
  • Activists say activities at the shed will generate oil, grease, and electrical waste, besides hazardous materials such as acid and paints.
  • Also, construction of the depot will increase exploitation of ground water resources, they say.

What is the argument about the environmental cost of the project?

  • According to a report the area is home to 86 species of butterfly, 90 species of spider, 46 species of reptiles, 34 species of wildflower, and nine leopards.
  • As per the BMC’s tree census, there about 4.5 lakh trees in Aarey, which is described as Mumbai’s green lung.
  • Activists says the Aarey depot plot is the sole surviving natural floodplain of the Mithi, whose reclamation through construction and felling of trees would lead to greater inundation during the monsoon.

Arguments for the Project

  • The proposed car shed will be set up on only 33 hectares, which is barely 2% of the 1,278 hectares of the green belt.
  • Also, the trees that were felled over the weekend stood on only 17% of the land earmarked for the car shed.
  • The MMRCL has said that 60% of the trees are non-native and exotic, and can be replaced by native species.
  • The MMRCL has argued that the Metro will bring enormous environmental benefits by reducing the overall carbon footprint.

 

 

Print PDF

Newsletter Subscription
SMS Alerts