UPSC Courses

DNA banner


  • 06 June, 2022

  • 10 Min Read



It was found that at least 26 recommendations for the appointment of judges to the Bombay high court which is currently functioning at almost half of its sanctioned strength are pending with the government at different stages of consideration.

Recent controversy

  • Bombay high court has its main seat in Mumbai and branches in Nagpur, Aurangabad, and Goa.
  • Low strength – currently Bombay high court has 57 judges against a sanctioned strength of 96 judges also five more judges are expected to retire this year.
  • The supreme court collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India had recommended the appointment of ten advocates as judges.
  • According to the National Judicial Data Grid, there are 5.88 lakh cases pending before the Bombay high court of which 1.14 lakh fresh cases were filed in the last one year.

Reasons behind the situation

  • The main reason behind this situation is the overall shortage of judges in the high courts in India.
  • The situation is worst in the subordinate courts where along with the shortage there is also a lack of basic infrastructure.
  • There are more than 5,000 vacancies in subordinate courts against the total sanctioned strength of 24,490 judges
  • Disruptions due to COVID further clogged the Indian judicial system.
  • Though there was a drop in new cases as courts went digital, but with lockdown restrictions in place, a slower disposal rate resulted in more pending cases.

Collegium system

  • The Collegium system is the system of appointment and transfer of judges that has evolved through judgments of the Supreme Court, and not by an act of the parliament or by a provision of the constitution.
  • The Supreme Court collegium is headed by the Chief Justice of India and it also comprises four other senior-most judges of the court.
  • A High Court collegium is led by its Chief Justice of the respective High Court and four other senior-most judges of that court.
  • Names recommended for appointment by a High Court collegium reach the government only after approval by the Chief Justice of India and the Supreme Court collegium.
  • Judges of the higher judiciary are appointed only through the collegium system, and the government has a role only after the names have been decided by the collegium.

Evolution of the Collegium System

The collegium system has its base in a series of Supreme Court judgments called the ‘Judges Cases’.


In S P Gupta Vs Union of India, 1981, the Supreme Court judgment held that consultation doesn’t mean concurrence and it only implies an exchange of views.


In The Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association Vs Union of India in 1993, a nine-judge Constitution Bench overruled the previous decision and came up with a specific procedure called ‘Collegium System’ for the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary.

The majority verdict in the Second Judges Case accorded primacy to the CJI in matters of appointment and transfers while also ruling that the term “consultation” would not diminish the primary role of the CJI in judicial appointments.

The role of the CJI is primal because this being a topic within the judicial family, the executive cannot have an equal role in the matter.


In the Third Judges case in 1998, the Court ruled that the consultation process adopted by the Chief Justice of India requires ‘consultation of plurality judges’.

The sole opinion of the CJI will not constitute the consultation process.

He should consult a collegium of four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court and even if two judges give an opposite opinion, he should not send the recommendation to the government.

The court also held that the recommendation made by the Chief Justice of India without following the norms and requirements of the consultation process is not binding on the government.

Criticism of the Collegium System

  • It lacks transparency and accountability.
  • It creates a scope for nepotism.
  • It overlooks several talented junior judges and advocates

Role of government in judicial appointment

The government’s role is limited. The government can object and seek clarification regarding the collegium choice. But if the collegium sends the same name again, then the government is bound under Constitution bench judgment, to appoint them as judges.

Efforts made to address the Collegium System

Justice M N Venkatachaliah’s commission has favoured the change and prescribed a National Judicial Appointment Commission which will consist of:

  • CJI and the two senior-most judges
  • The law minister
  • An eminent person from the public, to be chosen by President in consultation with the CJI

The government brought the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act in 2014, for the formation of the National Judicial Appointment Commission to replace the collegium system for the appointment of judges.

A five judges constitutional bench declared this act unconstitutional in 2015 on the ground that it posed a threat to the independence of the judiciary.

Constitutional Provisions for Appointment of Judges

The Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are appointed by the President under Articles 124(2) and 217 of the Indian Constitution.

Article 124(2) says that “Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts in the States as he may deem necessary.

Article 217 says that Every Judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the State, and, in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of the High Court.

Source: The Hindu

Pradhan Mantri Suryodaya Yojana

Recently, Prime Minister announced Pradhan Mantri Suryodaya Yojana under which 1 crore households will get rooftop solar power systems. India’s Status of Current Solar Capacity India currently stands at 4th place globally in solar power capacity. As per Ministry of New an

Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA)- NGO 

The Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010 (FCRA) registration of two prominent non-governmental organisations (NGOs) — Centre for Policy Research (CPR) and World Vision India (WVI) have been cancelled this month. What is FCRA? Key provisions of FCRA, 2010 Key aspects Description

Voice clone-AI

Voice clone fraud has been on the rise in India. AI voice cloning – It is the process of creating a synthetic replica of a person’s voice through machine learning and speech synthesis technology.It is called as voice deepfakesor audio deepfakes. Objective – To achieve a high level of na

Science communication- how to promote

Steps taken by India to promote Science Communication Publications and Information Directorate (PID) - An organisation under Council of Science and Industrial Research (CSIR) established in 1951 for publishing and disseminating scientific information in India. National science magazines- The PI

Universal Basic Income (UBI)- Analysis

Universal Basic Income (UBI) can strengthen welfare architecture and unlock the nation’s latent demographic potential. UBI - It is an income support mechanism typically intended to reach all or a very large portion of the population regardless of their earnings or employment status. Objective- To provide enough to co


Search By Date

Newsletter Subscription
SMS Alerts

Important Links

UPSC GS Mains Crash Course - RAW Prelims Answer Key 2024