×

UPSC Courses

DNA banner

DAILY NEWS ANALYSIS

  • 04 May, 2021

  • 15 Min Read

J C Pant is the Acting Chairperson of NHRC

J C Pant is the Acting Chairperson of NHRC

  • Justice Prafulla Chandra Pant, a former Supreme Court judge, has been appointed the Acting Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) with effect from April 25, the commission said on Monday. Justice Pant was appointed a member of the NHRC on April 22, 2019.
  • The post of Chairperson has been vacant since the former Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu completed his tenure on December 2.

National Human Rights Commission and State Human Rights Commission, 1993

What is the news?

  • The Calcutta High Court has directed the Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to constitute a committee to examine complaints of post-poll violence in West Bengal.
  • A Bench of five judges directed that the committee “shall examine all the cases, and maybe by visiting the affected areas, and submit a comprehensive report to this court about the present situation”.
  • The court asked the committee to suggest “steps to be taken to ensure confidence of the people that they can peacefully live in their houses and also carry on their occupation or business to earn their livelihood”. The order, issued on June 18, directed that “the persons prima facie responsible for crime and the officers who maintained calculated silence on the issue be pointed out”.

NHRC and SHRC, 1993

  • Both are Statutory Autonomous bodies established under Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
  • It is the watchdog of Human Rights in India. They are Rights w.r.t. Life, Liberty, Equality & dignity guaranteed by Constitution or of International Covenants. Accordingly 25 States have constituted SHRCs through official Gazette Notifications.

NHRC

SHRC

  1. Composition of NHRC: Chairman, 4 members and 4 Ex-officio members.
  2. Qualifications for NHRC:
    1. Chairperson should be a Retd. CJI and
    2. Members should be Serving or Retired Judge of SC, a Serving or Retd CJHC and 2 persons having practical experience of Human Rights.
    3. 4 Ex-officio members are Chairmen Of National Commission of Minorities, SCs, STs, Women.
  3. Appointment: by Prez on the recommendations of a 6 member Committee: PM as its head, Speaker of Lok Sabha, Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition in both Houses of Parliament and Home Minister.
  4. Further, a sitting Judge of SC or a sitting Chief Justice of HC can be appointed only after consultation of CJI.
  1. Composition of SHRC: Chairperson & 2 members.
  2. Qualifications for SHRC:
    1. Chairperson should be a Retd. CJHC and
    2. Members should be serving or Retd. Judge of HC or Dist Judge in the State for > 7 years’ experience and having knowledge or practical experience of human rights.
  3. Appointment by Gov (but removal by Prez) on the recommend of a Committee consisting of CM as its head, Speaker of Legislative Assembly, State Home Minister and Leader of Opposition of Legislative Assembly. If State has LC, then the committee also has Chairman of LC and Leader of Opposition of LC. Further, a sitting JoHC or a sitting Dist Judge can be appointed only after consultation of CJHC of the State concerned.

  • Tenure (of both NHRC & SHRC): 5 years or 70 years whichever is earlier. Not eligible for further Employment under Center or States.
  • Removal (of both NHRC & SHRC) by Prez: (Same as of UPSC, CVC, CIC) Removal is done only by Prez under the following conditions:
    1. If he has gone bankrupt or If, according to Prez, he is of unsound mind or If he is involved in paid employment outside the duties of office.
    2. Prez can also remove her in case of Misbehavior or incapacity (defined in Constitution), Prez refers this matter to SC. SC’s decision is binding on Prez. Then he may remove. During the course of enquiry by the SC, Prez can suspend them.
  • The salary, allowances & service conditions are determined by C / S govt & can’t be varied to his disadvantage post appointment.
  • Functions of Both:
    1. To strengthen the institutional arrangements through which human rights could be addressed in their entirety and in a more focused manner.
    2. To inquire into any violation of Human Rights, either suo motu or on a petition presented to it or an order of a Court. SHRC can only enquire into matters related w State List or Concurrent List of the 7th Schedule of the Constitution. However if any such cases is enquired by NHRC or any other Statutory Commission, then SHRC doesn’t inquire into that case.
    3. To intervene in any proceeding involving allegation of violation of Human rights pending before a Court.
    4. To visit jails or detention places, study the living conditions of inmates and make recommendations.
    5. To review the Constitution and legal safeguards for the protection of HRs and make recommendations.
    6. To review the factors including acts of terrorism that inhibit the enjoyment of rights and recommend remedial measures.
    7. To spread human rights literacy and encourage the efforts of NGOs working in this direction.
    8. To study treaties and international agreements on Human Rights and make recommendations.
    9. To undertake and promote research in the field of Human Rights.
    10. To undertake such other functions as it may consider necessary for the promotion of human rights.
  • Working:
    1. It can't by itself punish the guilty. That is the responsibility of courts. It makes independent and credible enquiry into any case of violation of human rights. Also if any govt officer neglects.
    2. It regulates its own procedure. It has all the powers of a Civil Court and its proceedings have a judicial character. It may call for info or reporty from C & S govts or any subordinate authority.
    3. The NHRC has its own nucleus of working staff for investigation. Besides, it is empowered to utilize the services of any officer or investigating agency of C or S govt. It has also established effective coop with NGOs with 1st hand info about HR violations.
    4. It can only look into the matter of violation within 1 year of its occurrence and not after that.
    5. After enquiry, It may recommend the concerned government or authority
      1. To make payment of compensation or damages to the victim.
      2. The initiation of proceedings or any other action against the guilty public servant.
      3. For the grant of immediate interim relief to the victim.
    6. It may approach the SC or HC concerned for the necessary directions, orders and writs.
    7. It can summon witnesses, question any govt official, demand any official paper, visit any prison for inspection or send it's own team for on the spot inquiry.
  • Criticisms:
    1. It has no power to punish the violators of Human Rights nor can it provide any relief to the victim.
    2. The functions are mainly recommendatory in nature. Not binding. But it should be informed about the action taken on its recommendations within 1 month.
    3. The Commission has a limited role, powers and jurisdiction wrt violation of human rights by the member of Armed forces. In this sphere NHRC may seek a report from Govt and make recommendations. Center has to inform on actions taken within 3 months.
    4. Yet the govt considers cases forwarded by it. It is therefore improper to say that the Commission is powerless. It enjoys great material authority and no govt can ignore its recommendations.
    5. NHRC submits its annual report to Central govt and State govt concerned. SHRC submits to State govt.
  • Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 also provides for the establishment of Human Rights Courts:
    1. Acc to the act, HRC can be est in every district for speedy trial of violation of Human Rights.
    2. These Courts can be set up by the State govt only w the concurrence of concerned CJHC.
    3. For every HRC, State govt specifies a public prosecutor or appoints an advocate (practice > 7 years) as a special public prosecutor.
    4. Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006
      1. NHRC can undertake visits to jails even without intimation to State Govt.
      2. Chariman and members of NHRC resign to Prez, and SHRC resign to Guv.
      3. NHRC can transfer complaints received by it to SHRCs.

Source: TH


What is Mission Indradhanush ?

Mission Indradhanush was launched in 2014 under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.  1. Between 2009 - 2013, only 1% coverage per year has increased. We have to make it to 5%. 2. Objectives of Mission Indradhanush: We have the aim of full coverage by 2020. Cover all those children who are either unvaccinated or are part

Mediation Bill 2021 - Detailed Overview

A Bill that could alter the Mediation landscape The background behind Mediation Bill:         In General, Disputes Became part and parcel of  Day-to-Day Life. Someone or the Other belonging to family or else not a part of the family would be fighting for something. These Disputes may be for Smaller or B

Military exercises of India

List of all Military Exercises of India 2021 Military Exercises of India with Neighbours Sampriti: India & Bangladesh Mitra Shakti: India & Sri Lanka Surya Kiran: India & Nepal Hand in Hand Exercise: India & China Ekuverin: India & Maldives Military Exercises of India with Other countries Maitree Exer

Consumer Protection Rules, 2021

Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021 1) Pecuniary Jurisdiction The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 promulgates a three-tier quasi-judicial mechanism for redressal of consumer disputes namely district commissions, state

Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban) 2.0

The Swachh Bharat Mission - Urban (SBM-U), launched on 2nd October 2014 aims at making urban India free from open defecation and achieving 100% scientific management of municipal solid waste in 4,041 statutory towns in the country. The objectives of the mission are mentioned below: Elimination of open defecation Eradication of Manual S

Students Achievement

Search By Date

Newsletter Subscription
SMS Alerts