×

UPSC Courses

DNA banner

DAILY NEWS ANALYSIS

GS-II :
  • 03 March, 2020

  • 3 Min Read

State Funding of Elections

Syllabus subtopic: Salient Features of the Representation of People’s Act.

Prelims and Mains focus: about the issue and various committees related to it

News: The Election Commission has informed the Government that it is not in favour of state funding of elections.

Why?

  • The Election commission is of the view that it would not be able to prohibit or check candidates’ expenditure over and above the state’s provision.

Background

  • The state funding of polls was recommended by the Indrajit Gupta Committee in 1998.

  • The committee had suggested that state funding would ensure a level playing field for poorer political parties and argued that such a move would be in public interest.

  • The committee had recommended some limitations, saying that state funds should only be given to recognised national and State parties and that funding should be given in kind, including free facilities provided to these parties and their candidates. The panel admitted that the economic situation of the country only suited partial and not full state funding of elections

About the issue

State funding of elections has been suggested in the past in response to the high cost of elections. A few government reports have looked at state funding of elections in the past, including:

  1. Indrajit Gupta Committee on State Funding of Elections (1998)
  2. Law Commission Report on Reform of the Electoral Laws (1999)
  3. National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (2001)
  4. Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2008)

  • The Indrajit Gupta Committee (1998) endorsed state funding of elections.

  • The 1999 Law Commission of India report concluded that total state funding of elections is “desirable” so long as political parties are prohibited from taking funds from other sources. The Commission concurred with the Indrajit Gupta Committee that only partial state funding was possible given the economic conditions of the country at that time. Additionally, it strongly recommended that the appropriate regulatory framework be put in place with regard to political parties (provisions ensuring internal democracy, internal structures and maintenance of accounts, their auditing and submission to Election Commission) before state funding of elections is attempted.

  • “Ethics in Governance”, a report of the Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2008) also recommended partial state funding of elections for the purpose of reducing “illegitimate and unnecessary funding” of elections expenses.

  • The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution, 2001, did not endorse state funding of elections but concurred with the 1999 Law Commission report that the appropriate framework for regulation of political parties would need to be implemented before state funding is considered.

Source: The Hindu


Ministry of Minority Affairs-Year review

The Ministry was carved out of Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment in 2006. Objective- To ensure a more focused approach towards issues relating to the notified minority communities - Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Sikhs, Parsis and Jain. As per Census 2011, around 19.3% of the population belongs to minorities. Mandate- To f

Indian Railways in 2023 – Year Review

The Performance of Indian Railways in 2023 showed significant strides in infrastructure but reveals underwhelming freight loading and financial performance. How Indian Railways performed in 2023? Near completion of DFC – Dedicated Freight Corridors are nearing completion with more than 200 freight trains already runnin

Global Nuclear Order and Geopolitics

The Global Nuclear Order refers to the international system, agreements, norms, and structures that govern and regulate the use, possession, proliferation, and control of nuclear weapons and nuclear energy worldwide. It encompasses a complex network of treaties, agreements, and norms that have evolved over time to manage the risks associated wit

Supreme Court Judgments in 2023

The Supreme Court has delivered several landmark judgments in 2023. S.No Name of the Case Judgement 1 Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India Upheld the decision taken by the Union Government to demonetise currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs.10

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare – YEAR REVIEW

The Ministry is charged with health policy in India, which is also responsible for all government programs relating to family planning in India. Departments Department of Health and Family Welfare Department of Health Research Union Minister- Mansukh L. Mandaviya Health Missions National Health Mission (NHM) &

DNA

01 Feb,2024

Toppers

Search By Date

Post Feed

Newsletter Subscription
SMS Alerts

Important Links